Skip to main content

Testing With Python: The Django Way Part 1


One thing I really slacked on while developing AWiKi (it's on internal network hence can't show you) was testing. Maybe that's not the right way to put it. It's not like I didn't test. In fact, I did a lot of testing. A lot of painstaking manual testing. For every change. So, in a way it was really the opposite of slacking. It was working a whole lot harder than I really needed to. It was also dumb. 
Being conversant in conventional Automation methods I quickly tried my hands on automating a few scenarios using QTP and Selenium. But this soon led me to a more severe problem: I was surrounded with uncountable number of scenarios I needed to automate and soon it was eating more time than I was devoting in the development.
Soon I realized What I did slack on, was figuring out how Django's unit testing framework worked. Well, no more! In fact, it's really easy to set up. Writing tests can also be somewhat painstaking when it comes to ensuring you've covered every possible input, but at least that pain is an investment that repays itself every time you make a change to the program and you can know right away if you've broken something that used to work. 
As usual the Django documentation is excellent. Highly recommend for learning everything about testing with Django. What I hope to do here is give a brief overview of what you need to do some basic testing. Partly as a reminder for myself on future projects, and hopefully to help out anyone in the same position I was before I started.

Getting Started 

If your Django app is relatively new, the startapp command already created a tests.py file when you ran it to set up your app. This file includes some helpful examples, like so:

"""
This file demonstrates two different styles of tests (one doctest and one
unittest). These will both pass when you run "manage.py test".

Replace these with more appropriate tests for your application.
"""

from django.test import TestCase

class SimpleTest(TestCase):
    def test_basic_addition(self):
        """
        Tests that 1 + 1 always equals 2.
        """
        self.failUnlessEqual(1 + 1, 2)

__test__ = {"doctest": """
Another way to test that 1 + 1 is equal to 2.

>>> 1 + 1 == 2
True
"""} 

If you don't already have a tests.py file, the important things to note are that you have to import the TestCase class from django.test and create a new class which subclasses it. Each method defined in this class will correspond to one test, usually the test of a corresponding function in your views.py file. To test a particular function from views.py, define a method with the name test_functionname.

Test data 

Now, I'm guessing your application probably manipulates some sort of data. As a matter of fact mine does a lot. The Django test runner is kind enough to setup and destroy a complete test database for the purposes of running your tests. There's two important consequences to this. First, the database user specified in your settings.py file has to have the necessary permissions to create and destroy databases. So, make sure that's the case. Second, if you already have a test database set up on your development machine (or wherever), with data you've inserted during your manual tests, the test runner won't have access to any of it.
To get some data for your tests, you can try exporting the data already in your test database with Django's dumpdata command. The test runner can then load it as a fixture. Honestly, I just couldn't get this to work. Some googling about the errors I was getting seemed to indicate that I wasn't the only one having problems with it. The update to natural keys announced for Django 1.2 seemed like it would help, but I've still been unsuccessful, so far. In any event, I plan on keeping an eye on future developments to see if there's any improvements in this area.
In the meantime, I went ahead and did it the hard way. I created a separate file called testsetup.py. I imported all the models for my project and defined a function also called testsetup. All this function does is create a few instances for each model with all their various possible configurations. By defining a method called setUp in the new class I created in tests.py and calling this function there, all of the necessary data will be added to the test database before the tests are run.


class ViewTest(TestCase):

    def setUp(self):
        testsetup()


And now we will delve into the requests. But that's for another day (Part 2)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Racecraft (Project Koru) · Prologue — The Origin Story

Racecraft · Prologue , The Origin Story It Started With a Wine List and a Question About Racing How a happy-hour conversation in the Bay Area turned into a trustable AI race coach , and then into a second version that runs entirely on a phone, on the NPU. This is the prologue to a five-part series. Two years ago(1st November, 2024) I was in the Bay Area for a GDE Summit. If you've never been: it's a couple of days of talks among Google Developer Experts, the kind of people who get unreasonably excited about a new on-device runtime, and then , mercifully , a happy hour where everyone stops performing and just eats. We ended up at a restaurant(Puesto Santa Clara), a long table of GDEs, and I was doing the most important engineering of the evening: trying to decide which wine to order. Across the table was Ajeet Mirwani . I don't even remember how the wine talk turned into racing talk , these things drift , but the moment the word "racing" ...

A Split‑Brain Neuro‑Symbolic Training Method for High‑Velocity Autonomous Coaching from Telemetry

 Author: Rabimba Karanjai Scope: Problem statement + data methodology + model training (no deployment discussion) Abstract Real‑time coaching in motorsport is a safety‑critical learning problem : a system must map noisy, high‑frequency telemetry to short, actionable guidance that remains physically consistent and avoids hazardous recommendations . This paper proposes a “Split‑Brain” training formulation that separates (i) a semantic coaching target (what action/critique should be expressed) from (ii) a reflexive interface (how actions are represented as compact, verifiable tokens). The approach trains a Small Language Model (SLM) in the Gemma family [1] using QLoRA fine‑tuning [2] , and introduces a telemetry tokenizer plus teacher‑student synthesis pipeline to generate instruction‑action pairs at scale. Core contribution: a reproducible method to convert “ golden lap ” differential tel...

My Friend's MRI Didn't Come with a Manual, So I Built One with AI

Gemma 4 Good Hackathon · Impact Track · Health & Sciences It started with two envelopes. One contained a single sheet of paper, a radiologist's report for my friend. It was a wall of text that might as well have been written in another language. Words like " parenchymal volume ," " hyperintensities ," and " susceptibility artifact " stared back at us, creating more anxiety than they resolved. The other was a flimsy paper sleeve containing a CD-ROM. This, we were told, held the actual images from her MRI scan. The ground truth. And we couldn't even look at it. Our laptops, like most these days, don't have disc drives. For a moment, this crucial, deeply personal piece of her health information was a coaster. I felt that familiar, hot-wired frustration every engineer knows: the feeling of being locked out by a dumb problem. The powerlessness was infuriating. So, I did what any slightly obsessive software engineer would do...